What do you think

Guest

AmericanPitbull wrote:: Personally I like both dogs, but you are wanting to work on height issues and fill out the face features...so I would have to say dog #2. Midwest is right about dog#1's lips, but loose skin can always be grown into.

I would like to know what about panache's structure stands out more to you then Kurupts?

To me, Panache's muscle definition is better, better stance as well. His cheek bone isnt as full as Kurupts though. How old are both of those dogs? Just curious.

Both are well over two and done growing. There is no way panache has the better muscle ton. He could be as toned up but panache is not being worked where as kurupt is.

Subject: Re: What do you think Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:02 am

they are both very good looking dogs christie and either one would be a !!!!! good stud but i would lean more towards Kurupt on this one since he has more of the qualities that you are working towards on this breeding. You got to go with the one that is going to possibly give you what you are wanting to produce out of the breeding.

Subject: Re: What do you think Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:42 am

I like the second candidate....